Legal Opinion

Meshna v. Scrivanos

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 21, 2011No. 201101849BLS1Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

INTRODUCTION

This an action under the tips provision of the Massachusetts Wage Act, G.L.c. 149, §152A. Plaintiffs, employees of Dunkin’ Donuts franchises owned or operated by defendant Constantine Scrivanos, claim that their employer has violated the law by preventing them from accepting or keeping tips offered or left for them by customers.1 Before the Court is the defendant-employer’s motion for judgment on the plead*314ings. For the reasons that will be explained, the motion will be denied.

BACKGROUND

The first amended complaint, filed on June 24, 2011, alleges as follows.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Draghetti v. ChmielewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API