Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1910No. Calendar No. 23,859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Mandamus by Garfield S. Flanders to compel the board of supervisors of Yan Burén county to reconvene and pass upon certain petitions and call an election under the local-option law. An order denying the writ is reviewed by relator on writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This is certiorari to review the action of the circuit judge in refusing a mandamus to compel the respondent to reconvene and pass upon the petitions presented, and call an election under the local-option statute, so called. It appears by the original petition and answer in the court below that petitions were presented to the board containing the names of 2,757 alleged voters of the county; that there were attached to the petitions affidavits complying with the statute in all respects, except as to the township of Columbia, in which the affidavit of posting failed to state the particular…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kern v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Rutledge v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Burton v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API