Legal Opinion

Frank & Co. v. Weiner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1929No. 6679PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The controlling question is whether the waiver of homestead expressed in the statement by Weiner to Frank & Company is valid relatively to his present indebtedness. There was an indebtedness on the account of two thousand dollars at the date of the waiver. This was gradually discharged by the course of payments, which exceeded the amount of subsequent purchases. Consequently the present indebtedness represents debt incurred for purchase of goods after the alleged homestead waiver. In the Civil Code '(1910), § 3413, it is provided: “Any debtor may, except as to wearing apparel and three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pincus v. Meinhard & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Ragan, Malone & Co. v. TaffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Levinson v. Rosenheim Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pass v. PassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Southern Wholesale Corp. v. PincusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API