Jacques v. Litle
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceeding in Quo Warranto. The facts are stated in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in May, 1893.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This is a proceeding in quo warranto, brought originally in the supreme court, and involves only the title to the office of treasurer of a school district in Gray county. It appears that, at the annual meeting in 1891, Lloyd Litle was elected treasurer of the district for a term of three years, and at that time W. F. Castner was director and J. T. Dean clerk' of the district. In order to secure employment as teacher of the district school, Dean resigned as clerk, and T. B. Seaton was appointed in his stead. Without any meeting of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Dullam v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Page v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Chase v. HathawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- State ex rel. Denison v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Schmitz v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- McMaster v. HeraldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Akin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Lease v. FreebornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.