Emerald Coast Finest Produce Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is applicant’s Motion to Intervene of Awardee, Military Produce Group, LLC (Motion or Mot.). Neither plaintiff nor defendant opposes this motion.
Military Produce claims “an unconditional right” to intervene under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b). Mot. 3. However, this statute merely confers on the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over actions by “an interested party” who objects to a Federal agency’s bid solicitation, proposed award, award, or any other violation of statute or regulation related to the procurement process. 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b) (2000). This provision…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Anderson Columbia Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Air Borealis Limited Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022