Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fibre Co. v. . Cozad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

Civil action for the recovery of lands embraced in State Grant No. 2861, and located on the waters of "Little Snowbird" in Graham County.

The plaintiff and the defendants all claim title to the land in controversy under State Grant No. 2861, entry 6748, issued to W. H. Herbert on 18 December, 1865. The defendants at the trial of the cause conceded that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession (602) of so much of said grant No. 2861 as is lapped upon and covered by grant No. 2830, entry No. 1362, and judgment was entered accordingly; hence this lappage is not in issue on this…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Green v. Lessee of NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Todd, Schenck & Co. v. OutlawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. McKeen v. Delancy's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1809

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ANDREWS EX REL. ANDREWS v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. ANDREWS EX REL. ANDREWS v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Andrews ex rel. Andrews v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API