Legal Opinion

Manigoult v. Arline

New York City Family Court

Decided January 21, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael J. Miller, J.

Respondent, Curtis Arline, has filed a petition requesting that the court modify the income execution served upon *196respondent’s employer, Xerox Corporation, Rochester, New York by the Monroe County Department of Social Services Support Collection Unit. The court has accepted respondent’s petition as a request to vacate and modify its prior decision in this matter pursuant to the court’s continuing jurisdiction. (Family Ct Act § 451.)

The court, after having reviewed this matter including respondent’s petition and supporting papers and petitioner’s…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API