Manigoult v. Arline
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael J. Miller, J.
Respondent, Curtis Arline, has filed a petition requesting that the court modify the income execution served upon *196respondent’s employer, Xerox Corporation, Rochester, New York by the Monroe County Department of Social Services Support Collection Unit. The court has accepted respondent’s petition as a request to vacate and modify its prior decision in this matter pursuant to the court’s continuing jurisdiction. (Family Ct Act § 451.)
The court, after having reviewed this matter including respondent’s petition and supporting papers and petitioner’s…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kennedy v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998