Ryan Borchik v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Ryan Borchik, Case No. 2:21-cv-00567-BNW 5 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION 6 v. IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE REFERENCES TO OTHER 7 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST STATE Company, FARM [ECF 85] 8 Defendant. 9 10 11 Before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion in Limine No. 4: Preclude References to Other 12 Lawsuits Filed Against State Farm Preclude Personal Anecdotes by Counsel.” ECF No. 85. As 13 explained below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion in part and denies it in part. 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 A. Facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United Fire Insurance v. McClellandNevada Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.