Legal Opinion

Pitulla v. Novoselsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 8, 1990No. Nos. 1-88-3129, 1-89-0553 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

This consolidated appeal arose as a result of the trial court’s determination and award of attorney fees.

Joanne Pitulla (Petitioner) retained the law firm of Rinella & Rinella, Ltd., to represent her in her dissolution of marriage. Petitioner paid Rinella a $1,500 retainer. There was no written retainer agreement. Pursuant to a term in the marital settlement agreement, Pitulla was to pay Rinella an additional $8,500 in fees upon completion of the case. Following the prove up, Rinella advised petitioner that he would enter the judgment of dissolution upon receipt of the $8,500. Petitioner paid…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. MEPC American Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Pinkstaff v. Pennsylvania RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mulligan v. Joliet Regional Port DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C&f Packing Co., Inc. v. Ibp, Inc., and Pizza Hut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Burnham Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Di's, Inc. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. In Re County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Federal Sign v. Fultz (In Re Fultz)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API