Legal Opinion
State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 2009No. 2009-1310PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner, 123 Ohio St.3d 322,
2009-Ohio-4900.] THE STATE EX REL. LETOHIOVOTE.ORG ET AL. v. BRUNNER, SECY. OF STATE. [Cite as State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner, 123 Ohio St.3d 322,
2009-Ohio-4900.] The video-lottery-terminal provisions of 2009 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 1 do not fall within any of the exceptions to the right of referendum in that they are not laws providing for tax levies, appropriations for the current expenses of the state government, or emergency laws necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- James v. ValtierraSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. VoinovichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Newburgh Hts. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. Gil-Llamas v. Hardin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021