Legal Opinion

Larson v. Deering

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1917No. 14044PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered September 25, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on an official bond, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant Deering was the sheriff of Snohomish county. Appellant surety company was surety upon his official bond. Respondent Larson’s assignor obtained a judgment against Deering as sheriff for damages by reason of a wrongful levy. The surety company was not joined as a party to the action. The judgment being unsatisfied, respondent brought this action against Deering and the surety company, setting up the official character of Deering, his bond and the obligation of the surety company, which is in the language of the statute (Rem. Code, §§ 3985, 8325), binding the principal to “faithfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ShaferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Pico v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Costello v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bradley v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  5. Ihrig v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kramer v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Merchants Bank of Canada v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Craven v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. State Ex Rel. Coan v. Plaza Equity Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API