Legal Opinion

Micbar Realty Corp. v. Truval Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

Two actions have been tried together. Action No. 1 was instituted in this court by Micbar Realty Corp., hereinafter called Micbar, as vendor, to compel Truval Realty Corp., hereinafter called Truval, purchaser, specifically to perform a contract for the sale of real property known as 1452 Fulton Street, Brooklyn. Action No. 2 was instituted (before Action No. 1) in the Municipal Court by Truval against Micbar to recover the sum of $1,000 paid by Truval on the signing of the contract and also to recover expenses.

The property consisted of a plot of land 20 x 100, on which there was erected a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gotthelf v. . StranahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Montkane Funds, Inc. v. RuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Reich v. RosenblattNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Reich v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Welter v. AlesNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API