Bass Plating Co. v. Town of Windsor
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NEVAS, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The plaintiff alleges that actions of the defendant violated its rights under the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. The plaintiff claims that the rules, regulations and procedures of the defendant’s Air and Water Pollution Abatement Commission concerning the disposal of metal hydroxide waste in its landfill were arbitrary, discriminatory and impermissibly vague. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. Section 1343. The action…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Toussaint v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- BFI Waste Systems of North America v. Dekalb CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- AAK, INC. v. City of WoonsocketDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
- Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation of the New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Diamond Waste, Inc. v. Monroe County, Ga.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.