Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Safeguard Ins. v. Vorys

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1960No. 35859Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

Although statutory provisions for deposits such as the $53,000 in deposits made by the indemnity company with *112respondent superintendent are common, there are few helpful precedents with respect to the problem as to when and how companies making such deposits or their successors may get them back. See 23 American Jurisprudence 309, Section 331, 50 American Jurisprudence, 1110, Section 316, 29 American Jurisprudence, 473, Section 57, and annotation 116 A. L. R., 965.

In the petition, relator alleges that the merger of the indemnity company and the other insurance company with relator was made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mendelson v. MendelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wildermuth v. Lorain Coal & Dock Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Van Schaick v. BowenOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Continental Casualty Co. v. SaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API