Legal Opinion

Draper v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 23, 1950No. Docket No. 24544Published

Taxpayers are not entitled to a deduction for casualty loss by fire of jewelry and clothing owned by an adult daughter, notwithstanding the fact that the daughter was still dependent on her parents for support.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas J. Draper and Dorcas J. Draper, Husband and Wife, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Draper v. Commissioner

Docket No. 24544

United States Tax Court

15 T.C. 135; 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 110;

August 23, 1950, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Taxpayers are not entitled to a deduction for casualty loss by fire of jewelry and clothing owned by an adult daughter, notwithstanding the fact that the daughter was still dependent on her parents for support.

Thomas J. Draper, petitioner pro se.

Joseph F. Rogers, Esq., for the respondent.

Van Fossan, Judge.

VA…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Draper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  2. Hudson Trust Co. v. American Linseed Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API