Legal Opinion

Leyner v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1885Published

Appeal from Polk Circuit Court. Action in equity to quiet the title to real estate. The plaintiff claims under the patent title, and the defendants under a tax title and a decree of the district court quieting the title in their grantor. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

i. pleading : answer: deniai of knowiedgeand information. The only question we shall consider is whether a decree of the district court quieting the title to the real estate in controversy in the defendants’ grantor . „ . , ° is sufficient to bar this action. Counsel for the appellant contend that it is not, because it is admitted in the pleadings, as counsel claim, that the plaintiff had no notice of the action in which the decree was rendered. *189The petition states that a pretended decree was rendered by the district court quieting the title of said premises in Sarah II. Sanford, and against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manny & Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API