Legal Opinion

Kearns v. Davis Bros.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeK, C. J.

The defendants admit that they made the note to the plaintiff for $450 for balance due on the purchase of the tractor in question. The defendants allege misrepresentation in regard to the condition of the tractor, which the answer avers was not new nor all right and did not operate as represented, and set up a counterclaim. It is not necessary to consider the details of the controversy involved in the counterclaim because it was simply a matter of fact which the jury has answered against the defendants, and there is no dispute that $450 was the sum due by a note given as a balance due on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Odom v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. McCoy v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Moore v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. J. F. White Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Staunton Industrial Loan Corp. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API