Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Frankfort-Schuyler Central School District & Sarafin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition denied and award confirmed. Memorandum: Respondent Teachers’ Association filed a demand for arbitration of the following issue: "Did the Board violate the collective bargaining agreement and the lunch duty side memorandum when it did not implement the Committee’s elementary lunch duty recommendations for the 1989/90 school year? If so, what is the remedy for the violation?” Attached to the demand as the "agreement” of the parties was the "side memorandum”. Also attached was the arbitration provision of the collective bargaining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. North Syracuse Central School District v. North Syracuse Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Landmark Construction Corp. v. Iron Workers Local 580Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Rochester City School District v. Rochester Teachers Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API