Legal Opinion

Burke v. O'Neil

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1934No. Nos. 30,045, 30,046PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Defendants appeal from the orders denying their motions in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts or a new trial.

In early March, 1983, plaintiff Clara Robbins Burke fell and broke her wrist as she neared the curb at 2276 Otto avenue in the city of St. Paul. She and her husband were tenants in an apartment building operated by defendants. Their automobile was parked in front of the apartment. The accident occurred early in the evening. The street is boulevarded, the boulevard being about nine feet wide between the public sidewalk and the curb. Opposite the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Noonan v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Hanley v. Fireproof Building Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mahoney v. PerreaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Valin v. JewellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Sewall v. FoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Durkin v. LewitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  2. Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Lamb v. South Unit Jehovah's WitnessesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Woodley v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Bentson v. Berde's Food Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API