Legal Opinion

Young & Rubicam L.P. v. Gramercy Court Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered August 17, 1993, which granted defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment to the extent of holding that defendants’ compliance with the contract provision requiring them to seek plaintiff’s approval before settling related litigation is not a condition precedent to defendants’ right under the contract to an allocation of the settlement costs, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Our decision on the prior appeal (190 AD2d 518) did not, as plaintiff argues, implicitly find the consent requirement to be a condition precedent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young & Rubicam L.P. v. Gramercy Court AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API