Legal Opinion · Dissent

Infante v. Dignan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 2008Published

1Dissent

Scudder, P.J., and Hurlbutt, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent because, in our view, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition in reliance on the decision of the First Department in Matter of Mitchell v Helpern, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals with no writing (17 AD2d 922 [1962], affd 14 NY2d 817 [1964]). The petition in Mitchell sought the same relief sought by petitioner herein, i.e., the expungement of the Medical Examiner’s finding that the manner of death was suicide and the entry “in the records that it was accidental” (id.). The standard of review applied by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lauer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. MATTER OF YARBOUGH v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Arrocha v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Bambeck v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API