Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Ætna Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 25, 1899No. 145PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

June 14, 1891, near midnight, a collision occurred between the libelant’s steam tug F. W. Devoe and the yacht Ameila in the North river, and as a result the yacht sank and two of the persons on board of her were drowned. The 2Etna Insurance Company had, by its policy dated February 12, 1891, insured the libelant “and others on account of whom it may concern, loss payable to him or order” in the sum of $2,500, against such loss or damage as the steam tug might “become legally liable for from accident caused by collision.” That policy was in force at the time. Prompt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Steen v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Steel v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
  5. Spare v. Home Mut. Ins.United States Circuit Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tubize Chatillon Corp. v. White Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  3. Rogers v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
  4. Savin Express Co. v. Hanover Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Wheeler v. Ætna Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API