Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Buckner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

839 S.W.2d 754 (1992)

Linda M. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Debra Gail BUCKNER, Larry Eugene Buckner, Tobe McKenzie, and McKenzie Development Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

August 31, 1992.

H. Franklin Chancey, Banks & Associates, Cleveland, for plaintiff-appellant.

Fred M. Milligan, Milligan, Barry, Hensley & Evans, Chattanooga, for defendants-appellees.

Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen. and Reporter, and Pamela Bingham Broussard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for intervenor-appellee.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The determinative issue raised in this appeal is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Empress Health and Beauty Spa, Inc. v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Galligan v. ArovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Crowell v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API