Legal Opinion

Gaines v. Matesanz

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 22, 2003No. CIV.A.98-12092-RGSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STEARNS, District Judge.

I agree with Magistrate Judge Dein’s analysis, and her ultimate conclusion that despite an obvious slip of the tongue, the reasonable doubt charge taken as a whole did not violate petitioner’s due process rights. 1 I also agree that petitioner’s remaining complaints about the judge’s charge are without constitutional merit. The Magistrate Judge identifies the constitutional test for a challenge based on the sufficiency of the evidence, and fully and accurately explains why petitioner is not…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breese v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Colón-Díaz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  3. Bone v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. Carvalho v. KennewayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  5. Robertson v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API