Gaines v. Matesanz
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STEARNS, District Judge.
I agree with Magistrate Judge Dein’s analysis, and her ultimate conclusion that despite an obvious slip of the tongue, the reasonable doubt charge taken as a whole did not violate petitioner’s due process rights. 1 I also agree that petitioner’s remaining complaints about the judge’s charge are without constitutional merit. The Magistrate Judge identifies the constitutional test for a challenge based on the sufficiency of the evidence, and fully and accurately explains why petitioner is not…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Breese v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Colón-Díaz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Bone v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Carvalho v. KennewayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Robertson v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.