Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1923No. L. A. No. 7518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROCEEDING on Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Award affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Petitioner is here seeking an annulment of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. An application for an adjustment of claim having been filed, the commission found that “J. B. Smith, applicant, while employed as a carpenter on November 2, 1920, at Los Angeles, by defendant, P. M. Crockett, sustained injury occurring in the course of and arising out of his employment, as follows: While sweeping down some walls in defendant’s residence at the request of defendant’s wife, a foreign body entered his eye, resulting in ulceration and complete loss of sight of right eye.” As, at the time of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kramer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Jackson v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Boteler v. Gardiner-Buick Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Nugent Sand Co. v. HargesheimerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Williams v. Brownfield-Canty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API