Legal Opinion · Dissent

Powell v. Casco Nelmor Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1979No. 60422, (Calendar No. 7)Published

1DissentColeman, C.J.

Between the loose language employed in the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.101 et seq.; MSA 17.237(101) et seq., and the interpretations variously superimposed upon it, we frequently find ourselves mired in obscure, if not meaningless, catch-words. Some such words have lost in transit, through undiscriminating application, any specific meaning. Such is the basic problem in this case. The words "favored work’’ have evolved into meaning almost anything or nothing. As an analytical tool, they are inadequate as employed in the majority opinion. It is the indiscreet use of these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hood v. Wyandotte Oil & Fat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pulley v. Detroit Engineering & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Evans v. United States Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API