Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Berk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1958No. 58-14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, CHAS., Chief judge.

The appellant and decedent William Rothman were married January 20, 1954. Prior to his death on November 7, 1956, they .resided in one of the apartments of a 12-unit apartment house which was owned by him in Miami Beach.

By an ante-nuptial contract, appellant had agreed that if she should survive Roth-man and become his widow she would re-, ceive and accept $5,000 “in place, instead and in lieu of all rights, which, as widow, the party of the second part might otherwise have either as dower in real estate of the party of the first part or as distributive share of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. HerringSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Spitzer v. Branning, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Mott v. First National Bank of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. In Re Noble's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. McEwen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fieldman v. FeldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Guze v. GuzeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Race v. MoseleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. In re Estate WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API