Alewine v. State

Bernes, Judge.

Following a trial by jury, appellant Ralph Wilson Alewine was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol — less safe driver in violation of OCGA§ 40-6-391 (a) (1). On appeal, Alewine challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in refusing three requested jury instructions. We find no error and affirm.

1. When reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and we neither assess the credibility of the witnesses nor reweigh the evidence.…