Legal Opinion

Laliberte v. Salum

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 14, 1986No. 85-251-M.P., 85-262-M.PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

These consolidated petitions for certiora-ri 1 request review of a Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission) decree that awarded compensation to Edward F. Salum, an injured employee. The employer, Jean Laliberte d/b/a Laliberte Home Improvements (Laliberte), contends that the commission was without jurisdiction to hear the matter. The propriety of the commission’s exercise of jurisdiction is the sole issue before the court. We affirm.

In his original petition for benefits Salum alleged that while in the course of his employment as a carpenter, he fractured his right…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Martines v. Terminal Methods, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. Spikes v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. DiRaimo v. DiRaimoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. Di Orio v. R. L. Platter, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pouliot v. Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  2. LaFreniere v. DuttonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API