Legal Opinion

Gouin v. Gouin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 3, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1004We now turn to the petitioner’s request for relief in the nature of mandamus. Rule 2:21 applies when “a single justice denies relief from a challenged interlocutory ruling in the trial court.” The rule, therefore, does not apply to the petitioner’s appeal from the single justice’s denial of the request for a writ of mandamus.

Nevertheless, if we were to rule on the single justice’s decision that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the nature of mandamus, we would conclude that the single justice did not abuse his discretion. See Forte v. Commonwealth, 429 Mass. 1019, 1020 (1999). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Forte v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Thayer v. Clerk of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Gianopoulos v. Clerk-Magistrate of Attleboro DivisionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API