Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 30, 2017No. Case No. 8:17-cv-735-T-24 TGWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, United States District Judge

This cause comes before the Court on *1295Publix’s Motion for Summary Judgment.1 (Doc. No. 34). Plaintiff Arlene Ruiz opposes the motion and asks for summary, judgment in her favor instead. (Doc. No. 41). As explained below, Publix’s motion is granted.

I, Standard of Review

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ, P. 56(a). The Court must draw all inferences from the evidence in the light most • favorable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nathaniel Porter, Jr. v. Walter S. Ray, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. William Jackson Adams, Iv, Rosita L. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Liberty Life Assurance Co. v. Barbara KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API