Legal Opinion

Hall v. Nunn Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1919No. 1544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Hale County; R. C. Joiner, Judge. Suit by the Nunn Electric Company, a co-partnership, against the I-Iickox-Whyman Engineering Corporation and others, in which a writ of garnishment was issued against L. C. Wayland, and Ira W. Hall intervened. From a judgment therein in favor of the Nunn Electric Company, Ira W. Hall brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF,' C. J.

The defendant in error, Nunn Electric Company, a copartnership, on the 20th day of June, 1913, in a suit by it against Hickox-Whyman Engineering Corporation, and R. O. and R. H. Whyman, to recover $1,140.55, caused to be issued out of said suit a writ of garnishment against L. C. Wayland, commanding him to answer what he was indebted, etc., to the above-named defendants in the suit then pending. The writ was duly served on Wayland June 21, 1913. In answer to the writ Wayland denied being indebted, etc. This answer was controverted by defendant in error. The plaintiff in error Hall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gause v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hudson v. WilkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cuney v. DupreeTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Kahle v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keeran v. SalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. McEwen v. Sterling State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Hines v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Hines v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API