Sininger v. Thurner
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
The plaintiff filed this action in the common pleas court, praying for the cancellation of a contract, to exchange real estate, on the ground of fraud. The defendant denied the fraud and filed a cross-petition praying for specific performance.
On the trial de novo of this appeal on questions of law and fact in this court, two issues were developed by the evidence.(1) Evidence was offered of the statements of one Huck in support of the allegation of fraud. A consideration of this evidence discloses that there is no evidence of any substantial misrepresentation and no…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Clotfelter v. TelkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Findley v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Leeb v. BremsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1946