Blue Ridge Interurban Railroad v. Oates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Lyon, J., at May Term, 1913, of HENDERSON.
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, J., dissents; BROWN, J., concurs in dissenting opinion. The Hendersonville Light and Power Company was chartered in 1904 for the purpose of supplying electric lights and power to Hendersonville and the surrounding community. Its power plant is located on Big Hungry Creek near Hendersonville; its lands consisting of three small tracts known as Power No. 1, Power No. 2, and Power No. 3, the first only being fully developed and supplying the electric power used at this time. The second is partly developed, and the third held for development in connection with the others. The company has…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Tiffany Bass v. Weinstein Management Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Blue Ridge Interurban Railway Co. v. Hendersonville Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Blue Ridge Interurban Railway Co. v. Hendersonville Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Goldston v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.