Legal Opinion

McGee v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 11, 2002No. A02A0280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

In November 1997, a jury found David McGee guilty of violating the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations *709(“RICO”) Act.1 The trial court subsequently granted him permission to file an out-of-time appeal. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony, as well as his trial counsel’s effectiveness. He also claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence at sentencing. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not weigh the evidence or assess…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hanifa v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Wilbanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Huntley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Randolph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chancey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Clemons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. McGee v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API