Legal Opinion

Claim of Hudspith v. Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Company and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 28th day of March, 1917.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

The accident happened January 10, 1916. Section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67; Laws of 1914, chap. 41) provides that the right to compensation shall be forever barred unless within one year after the injury a claim for compensation is filed with the Commission. The claim in this case was not so filed until January 10, 1917. The appellants contend that in computing time reckoned by years, the day from which the time is reckoned must be included in the reckoning, and that the claim, therefore, was not filed within one year. So it was held in Aultman &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Benoit v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pomeranz v. MoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  2. Prokop v. Bedford Waist & Dress Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Broderick v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Russell v. KniffinNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API