Legal Opinion

Carney v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1916No. 6392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

. Error from District Court, Pontotoc County ; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. ' Action by J. G. Chapman against David Alberson and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Lottie Carney brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WILSON, 0.

This action was originally' instituted by the defendant in error, J. C. Chapman, who will, for convenience, be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff. The action was one in ejectment against the defendant Tom Pendleton, who was a tenant in possession of the land in controversy, bfft as against the defendant Lottie Carney and the Albersons the action was one to quiet title. The defendant L. M. Chandler was, after the commencement of the suit, let in to- defend the warranty clause of his lease to Pendleton. At the trial of the case the issues between the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. State v. HumphreyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wilson v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. City of Guthrie v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Cox v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Cox v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API