Van Etten v. Sphinx Holding Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Motion on behalf of the above named defendant for leave to serve a supplemental answer herein and on behalf of Charles M. Hirschfelder and ten others for leave to intervene and become parties defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
This action was commenced in January, 1918, for the purpose of foreclosing the plaintiffs’ mechanics lien upon premises owned by the defendant Sphinx Holding Corporation; the other defendants were also lienors; the action was tried March 17 and 18, 1919, and the questions involved were afterwards submitted upon written briefs; *438memorandum of decision in favor of the plaintiffs was filed in August, 1919, which detailed all of the essential facts found and directed formal findings to be prepared as indicated in the memorandum; the findings were presented for signature on May 25,1920, and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Foshay v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Johnston v. . DonvanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Smith v. FleischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Uhlfelder v. TamsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Etten v. Sphinx Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Lowenstein v. ReikesNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith v. ManginNew York City Court · 1936