Navratil v. Bohm
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the- plaintiffs, Anton Nhvratil - and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made, at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office, of the.clerk of the county of Queens on the 20th day of December,, 1897, granting the defendant’s motion to change tlie-place, of trial of the action from the : county of Queens to the county of .New York. .. . . . -
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
The. affidavit-upon which the- defendant-, moved to change the place of trial of this-action shows that the motion was based solely upon- the 3d-subdivision bf section 987 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which authorizes the court to grant such, an application upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change.. There was no demand, under section .'986, that the change should be made because. Queens- county was not the - proper county, and, therefore, no question arises as- -tp whether the defendant was entitled to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Daley v. HellmanNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Mumford v. CammannNew York Supreme Court · 1805
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Brady v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Broderick v. MesaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Veeldorano v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.