Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Roséboom v. Billington (17 Johns, 181, 187); Hulbert v. Nichol (20 Hun, 454, 457); Decker v. Zeluff (23 App. Div. 107,109,110); Mills v. Davis (113 N. Y. 243, 247); Purdy v. Purdy (47 App. Div. 94, 96); Matter of Burrows (139 Mise. 802; 804; affd., as modfd., 235 App. Div. 764, revd., and decree of Surrogate affd., 259 N. Y. 449); United States Trust Company v. Stanton (76 Hun, 32; affd., 145 N. Y. 620), Matter of City of New York (239 id. 220; 225.) All concur. (The decree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In Re the Accounting of BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. United States Trust Co. v. StantonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Purdy v. PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. United States Trust Company v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API