Shannon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appeal is taken from a conviction for aggravated robbery. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court found that appellant had twice previously been convicted of felony offenses. Punishment was assessed at life. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Shannon v. State, 681 S.W.2d 142 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th] 1984).
We agree with the Court of Appeals that appellant’s convictions should be affirmed. Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
4Cited by8 opinions
- Munoz Ex Rel. Martinez v. Cameron County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.