Legal Opinion

Muscia v. Turner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1950No. 37,911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus.

The petitioner has not filed an abstract as required by the rules of this court. Respondents have, however, prepared and filed a certified abstract consisting of the petition for a writ and the answer and return of respondents, the sheriff of Leavenworth county and W. C. Parker, agent of the state of Missouri.

Omitting caption the petition signed and certified by petitioner's counsel, reads:

“Your petitioner, by his attorney, John H. Murray, shows the honorable Court:
“1. That your petitioner is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Powell v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Bissell v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Pyle v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. McTigue v. RhyneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Hanson v. NyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Benton v. RhyneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API