Legal Opinion

Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a cause of action. (Hyland v. Cobb, 252 N. Y. 325; Dickson v. McCoy, 39 id. 400; Buchanan v. Stout, 139 App. Div. 204; Quilty v. Battie, 135 N. Y. 201; Brice v. Bauer, 108 id. 428; Keenan v. Gutta Percha Manfg. Co., 46 Hun, 544; Hahnke v. Friederich, 140 N. Y. 224; Holzer v. Rosenberg, 209 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quilty v. . BattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Hahnke v. . FriederichNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Hyland v. CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Buchanan v. StoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Holzer v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924