Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a cause of action. (Hyland v. Cobb, 252 N. Y. 325; Dickson v. McCoy, 39 id. 400; Buchanan v. Stout, 139 App. Div. 204; Quilty v. Battie, 135 N. Y. 201; Brice v. Bauer, 108 id. 428; Keenan v. Gutta Percha Manfg. Co., 46 Hun, 544; Hahnke v. Friederich, 140 N. Y. 224; Holzer v. Rosenberg, 209 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quilty v. . BattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hahnke v. . FriederichNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hyland v. CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Buchanan v. StoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Holzer v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924