Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lemons v. Shipman

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1975No. 47351Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrightmire, Judge

I concur with that part of the opinion partially reversing the lower court judgment, but dissent as to that part affirming; In my opinion the language of 47 O.S.1971 § 158.1 is broad enough to cover counties. It authorizes “all . . . state departments and agencies not otherwise specifically authorized by law ... to carry insurance on vehicles, motorized machinery, or equipment owned and operated [by them] . . . .” The statute then provides, “An action for damages may be brought against such department or state agency . . . [and] the governmental immunity [defense] . . . shall be waived only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API