Britt v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of entering without breaking to commit a misdemeanor. The appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment. He bases this appeal on the theory that certain comments-questions made by the prosecutor on voir dire were prejudicial.
There are ample cases to support the proposition that a prosecutor may not directly or indirectly comment on a defendant’s failure to take the stand. See Trafficante v. State, 92 So.2d 811 (Fla.1957) ; Childers v. State, 277 So.2d 594 (4th D.C. A.Fla.1973); Young v. State, 280 So.2d 13 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1973) ; Carter v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Flaherty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by1 opinion
- Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975