Legal Opinion

Commuter Developments & Investments, Inc. v. Gramlich

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1979No. 42061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kortum, District Judge.

This is an action for the specific performance, or in the alternative, for damages, for breach of an option contract for the purchase of real estate. The District Court found for the plaintiff on the basis that a valid enforceable option existed and assessed damages against the defendants.

The plaintiff, Commuter Developments and Investments, Inc., is a corporation engaged in oil well promotion and land development. In 1965 the plaintiff purchased the land in question for $700 an acre. In 1971 the parties commenced a series of transactions involving the north 49 acres of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fletcher v. BrewerNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Grady v. DenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harre v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Adair v. AdairNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winberg v. CimfelNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gleeson v. FrahmNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Omaha National Bank v. Goddard Realty, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wessels v. WhetstoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API