McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
WEIMER, Justice.
| We granted certiorari to determine whether the appellate court’s recognition of a “novel and untested” cause of action comports with Louisiana mineral law. The purported cause of action imposes a duty on a mineral lessee purchasing the lessor’s mineral royalty rights to disclose to the lessor that the lessee has already negotiated the resale of the mineral rights to a third party for a significantly higher price. Finding the lessee’s duties upon which the appellate court premised its cause of action to be expressly excluded in the Mineral Code, we reverse the appellate…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fink v. BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Ramey v. DeCaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Montalvo v. SondesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davisson v. DavissonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Hedlesky v. HedleskyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Arcadis S U Inc v. Stryker Demolition & Environmental Services L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Bottinelli Real Estate, L.L.C. v. Johns Manville, Inc. and Roof Technologies, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Butler-Bowie v. Olive Branch Senior Care Ctr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.