Legal Opinion

Adams-Flanigan Company v. . Di Donato

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 19, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, respondent, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term, the case having been submitted upon an agreed statement of facts.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 19, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, respondent, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term, the case having been submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. The action was brought under the Bulk Sales Act (L. 1914, ch. 507), the question being whether the plaintiff was a creditor of defendant, respondent, on the 9th day of September, 1915, when he sold and disposed of a certain junk business then owned by him, within the…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Union Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Himmelstein v. BachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. GinsbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  5. Hadcock v. WigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API