Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Frank Special v. West Boca Medical Center

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 13, 2014No. SC11-2511Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LEWIS, J.,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the well-reasoned and intellectually direct majority opinion as it accepts and adopts the standard for review that the beneficiary of the error must establish that there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the verdict to uphold application of harmless error. I also concur with the common sense and logical majority opinion and conclude that the failure of the trial court to permit the jury to hear testimony from Dr. Dildy concerning the extremely high rate of amniotic fluid embolus (AFE)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API