Legal Opinion

Indurated Fibre Co. v. Amoskeag Indurated Fibre Ware Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire

Decided January 21, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Colt. J.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction. The principal issue raised is whether the words “indurated fibre” are the proper subject of a trade-mark. The plaintiff corporation is called the “Indurated Fibre Company,” and is located in Portland, Me., and the defendant corporation is called tlie “Amoskeag Indurated Fibre Ware Company, and 'is located in Manchester, N. IT. Upon the papers before me, it may be said, I think, that the plaintiff is the owner of the words in question, provided they are the subject of a valid trade-mark, and also that the defendant stamps its wares with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Selchow v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. People v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Fleischmann v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. MosesianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API